The International Studies Association is holding its Annual Convention for 2014 in Toronto, Canada.
Below is one proposal I have submitted for consideration by the International Political Economy and International Security sections:
Geopolitical Flashpoints, Systemic Risk & Distal-Influenced Spatiality
Abstract: Geopolitical flashpoints and systemic risk are now global arbitrage opportunities for hedge funds and political risk firms. Bridgewater (Ray Dalio), AQR Capital Management (Aaron C. Brown), PIMCO (Bill Gross & Mohamed El-Erian), Roubini Global Economics (Nouriel Roubini), and Stratfor (George Friedman & Robert D. Kaplan) have each contributed to media, policy, and practitioner debates about the 2008-10 rare earths bubble, the United States pivot toward Asia, and Iran-Syria-Russia oil speculation. This paper uses develops a Bayesian inference framework which emphasizes distal (far away) and spatial cause-effect relationships, in order to explain how hedge funds and political risk firms as non-state actors can enact global arbitrage and actively influence/shape public debates. I integrate analytical research from the sociology of finance (Donald MacKenzie), international security (Stephen G. Brooks), critical world security (Michael T. Klare & Naomi Klein), intelligence studies (Amy B. Zegart, Robert Jervis, & Gregory Treverton), hedge funds (Andrew Busch & Andrew Lo), and fictional speculation (Richard K. Morgan), to develop a new, inductive theory-building alternative to current explanations that emphasize proximate (near) and temporal causes. This paper advances new understanding about ‘casino capitalism’ (Susan Strange), expert networks, hedge fund activism, and political risk arbitrage.
In mid-2010, Ben Eltham and I discussed various ’emerging’ threats to traditional military strategy. One of them was rare earths: 11 elements used in defence, automobile applications, consumer electronics, and next generation turbines. We foresaw but didn’t act on the speculative bubble that occurred in rare earths between October and December 2010. There’s a lot driving market sentiment: ‘China’, ‘commodities’, ‘political risk’, ‘first mover advantage’, ‘iPods’, ‘greentech’, ‘next generation automobiles’, and ‘defence’.
Jason Miklian, a researcher at Oslo’s Peace Research Institute did act. Miklian invested in ‘day trade’ stocks of rare earth companies using $US9000 in personal savings. His account is revealing for several reasons. Miklian also foresaw the speculative bubble and continued to do fundamental research on the sector and markets. He timed his market entry. Then, Miklian lost what he had gained through attempting to ‘short’ the market in December 2010.
Miklian blames the market but perhaps the error lies in his ‘day trading’ strategy. Miklian traded a small account. He used options which increased his potential profits yet could quickly engulf his trading account if wrong. He bet on firms like the US-based Molycorp (MCP) which, although their stockprice doubled, are still years away from resolving the production problems with its Mountain Pass facility. Many other firms had questionable earnings and their stocks rose on mainly speculative activity. Others are relying on bullish activity when new production facilities come online in the next 18 months and major deals are signed. What Miklian perhaps needed was a valuation model and assessment of future earnings as well as his sector research. Finally, Miklian mistimed his exit. The volume of trade activity means that despite some market skepticism, trading in major stocks will continue. Technical analysis suggests that stocks of rare earths companies will trade within a range, rather than suddenly collapse.