Oct
9
2009
Personal Research Program
Slate‘s Daniel Gross on why Conde Nast closed Gourmet:
Gross contends CN’s decision is a ‘capitulation’ indicator to leave a
market, and it needed a McKinsey’s report to cut costs.The New York
Times has an interactive feature on CN’s shrinking portfolio of publications.
ACSPRI’s 2010 summer program on mixed methods research.
The New Yorker‘s George Packer on what Obama and the Generals are reading:
Packer has two excellent paragraphs on the limits of analogical
thinking, what history is useful for, and how it should guide
policymakers. Worth comparison with the National Defense University’s Professional Military Reading List notably the Joint Forces Staff College reading list.
Packer has a useful decision rule to deal with confirmation bias: “no
books that you already know will confirm the views you already hold.”
Vanity Fair‘s Next Establishment list: there’s a potential research program here for somebody to map Digital Hollywood’s deal flow using Pajek or other social network analysis software.
Comments Off | tags: ACSPRI, Conde Nast, George Packer, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University, Pajek, Vanity Fair | posted in Diary
Sep
29
2009
Personal Research Program
McKinsey asks Conde Nast for an across-the-board 25% cut to its expenditure budgets.
US M&A deal flow is on the rise, such as the Xerox-ACS deal (CNBC video).
The New Yorker‘s John Cassidy on the ‘rational irrationality’ of financial markets.
How private equity targets the vulnerabilities of integrated supply chains in America’s automobile manufacturing industry.
Australian strategist Paul Monk on the rise of the market state.
Tweet Memes
New York Times and Slate obituaries on speechwriter and columnist William Safire.
TNR‘s Daniel Pauly poses a dystopian scenario: the ‘aquacalypse’ or end of fish.
Comments Off | tags: ACS, CNBC, Conde Nast, Daniel Pauly, John Cassidy, McKinsey, New York Times, New Yorker, Paul Monk, private equity, supply chain management, The New Republic, TNR, William Safire, Xerox | posted in Diary
Sep
25
2009
Personal Research Program
Twitter’s Latest Valuation: $1 Billion.
McKinsey to cut Conde Nast magazine budgets by 25%?
David Elstein’s Beesley Lecture on public media in the digital age and Guardian commentary.
Iran Under Ahmadinejad.
Tweet Memes
Editors take a red pen to Dan Brown and Sarah Palin.
Popmatters remembers ‘gonzo’ journalist Hunter S. Thompson.
Venezuela’s Dangerous Liaisons.
Comments Off | tags: Ahmadinejad, Beesley Lecture, Conde Nast, Dan Brown, David Elstein, gonzo journalism, Guardian, Hunter S. Thompson, Iran, McKinsey, Popmatters, Sarah Palin, Twitter, Venezuela | posted in Diary
Nov
17
2008
Malcolm Gladwell‘s new book Outliers: The Science of Success (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 2008) appears to be the publishing event of the week.
Gladwell (The Tipping Point, Blink) spearheads a group of writers who are masterful at using anecdotes about insights from statistics, system dynamics and the decision sciences that will interest a broad readership. This group also in Chris Anderson (The Long Tail), James Surowiecki (The Wisdom of Crowds), Nassim Nicholas Taleb (Fooled by Randomness, The Black Swan), Tim Harford (The Undercover Economist), Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner (Freakonomics), and Michael Lewis (Liar’s Poker, The New New Thing, Moneyball) also belong to this group. Apart from outliers and tipping points these books explore intuitive decisions, long tail distributions, the Law of the Many, chance, low probabilty high-impact events, martingales, and data-driven decisions. Each author has a different background: Taleb is an epistemologist and former trader, Anderson is a technology pundit, and Lewis, Gladwell and Surowiecki are essayists and journalists.
For me, six observations emerge from these authors. First, they have a writing style that appeals to a broad audience. Second , they provide an introduction to quantitative elements of decision-making and judgments. Third, their publishers have created a niche market in airport reading and popular science paperbacks. Fourth, they differ in their approach to theory building: Anderson, Gladwell and Surowiecki take an insight, interview people, and promote it; Taleb, Harford and Lewis draw on their domain experience; and Levitt and Dunbar illustrate how a subject matter expert can collaborate with a journalist to reach a broader audience. Fifth, their books have seeded a range of Web 2.0 strategies, which vary in rigour, validity, generalisability and applicability to real-world analysis.
Finally, their publishers have used their marketing appeal to build an audience during turnarounds and post-acquisition integrations: Gladwell and Surowiecki helped revive The New Yorker, Levitt and Dunbar’s blog gained The New York Times an Internet readership, and Anderson revamped Wired after Conde Nast‘s acquisition.
Comments Off | tags: Blink, Chris Anderson, Conde Nast, decision sciences, decisions, domain experience, Fooled by Randomness, James Surowiecki, Liar's Poker, Malcolm Gladwell, martingales, Michael Lewis, Moneyball, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Outliers, post-acquisition integration, sabermetrics, statistics, The Black Swan, The Law of the Many, The Long Tail, The New New Thing, The New Yorker, The Tipping Point, theory building, theory formulation, Tim Harford, turnarounds, Web 2.0, Wired | posted in Research