Ahead of a workshop this Thursday where I plan on "unveiling" this concept to a room full of unsuspecting strangers, I thought I'd share it with some futures buddies and whoever else is reading for some critical and supportive feedback.
Rationale of OSF: Every statement about the future contains a number of assumptions – some known and acknowledged, the majority not. These statements, or conjectures, often come at the focal topic from a wide range of different perspectives and the “open source" approach outlined here aims to make these explicit and the thinking process far more collaborative. It is argued here that this could be achieved in practice through the use of collaborative technologies and the careful application of key principles:
For the draft eight principles and five-step process read on......
PRINCIPLES:
A) Greater openness: Presenting perspectives and information as transparently and reflexively as possible, as they pertain to your opinion on the future;
B) Wider participation: Actively encouraging as many perspectives and opinions about ‘the future of XYZ’ as is possible to come together in a collaborative and transparent way;
C) Willingness to be challenged (flexibility): Participants must not have a rigid perspective on the future, no matter how well informed, to enable the collective creative inquiry;
D) Establishing context: Greater understanding of the past and present (as they pertain to the focal topic) must be developed among all participants before discussing the future;
E) Generating greater concern for consequences: The potential futures consequences of the focal topic should become known by everyone that participates. (Ie. What are all the possible impacts and future implications? What does this topic impact on? What impacts upon the topic? Etc);
F) Surfacing and clearly identify assumptions: The process must be managed in such a way that leads to the surfacing and open identification of assumptions about ‘the future of XYZ’. The assumptions can then become known by all and challenged, where this is appropriate;
G) Learning loops: Feeding this back to all participants in a way that enables people to review and comment on the perspectives of others and widen everyone’s perspective/viewpoint; and
H) An integral view: Using the most comprehensive scanning and interpretation model possible.
PROPOSED FIVE-STEP PROCESS
1. Clearly define the scope of the futures exercise
What aspect of the future are you interested in? What timeframe? In order to begin a futures process you must first reduce your scope from infinity while being cognisant of what may be missed due to this.
2. Clearly articulate the purpose of the exercise
The purpose of the exercise must be explicit and up-front with no hidden agendas – participants must know why they are coming together, expectations (of sponsor, on participants) and for how long…
2.1 With the scope and purpose defined, design the futures process: What foresight tools and methodologies will be used? What overall foresight process is to be conducted?
3. Seek the widest possible level of participation
Ask the following sorts of questions and seek the widest possible level of participation: Which experts are most knowledgeable on the topic? Which additional people are passionate about it (but not ‘experts’)? Who knows nothing about it? Who needs to be involved? Who has an ‘interest’ (vested or otherwise) in being involved? Who might have a really interesting perspective on the topic?
4. Explain the ‘ground rules’ of the process (as per the principles outlined above)
5. Run the collaborative ‘open source’ futures thinking process (as per the principles)
5.1 Establish the context (sharing information, conduct/commission research, etc);
5.2 Openly share alternative perspectives and divergent opinions on ‘the possible future of XYZ’
5.3 Ensure the “action learning process” has many iterations (challenge, reflect, challenge, etc) and is facilitated to surface, clearly identify and share assumptions about the future
5.4 Generate rigorously developed and imaginative vision/pictures of ‘the future of XYZ’)
Comments (2)
I appreciate your direction with this Steve. My only caveat as you get started would be to recognise that it is hard to mandate such things as openness - you might get a more positive response and engagement with the principles if you put them in clearly aspirational/positive terms.
The second area you might wish to investigate, and this may only be possible through action learning, are a set of interaction guidelines or similar that can give people hand rails for what is likely a relatively new, confronting and difficult process. Maybe some basic rules about languaging disagreements, or noting when someone is about to go for the assumption-jugular etc...
Looking forward to hearing how the workshop goes at U3A...
Posted by Chris | March 15, 2007 10:57 AM
Posted on March 15, 2007 10:57
Hi Steve - how did this workshop go? How has your thinking on OSF developed? Love to hear more...
Posted by Chris | April 19, 2007 12:17 PM
Posted on April 19, 2007 12:17